May 1, 2002
Rowdy Raider
1234 Every Day Drive
Dayton OH 45678
Dear Rowdy: |
| This letter is a report of the
meeting that you, Dr. Noit Ahl, and I had on April 29, 2002, about your
master's thesis in nursing. For your thesis, you plan to conduct
a descriptive, correlational study to determine the relationship between
perceived satisfaction with educational opportunity and organizational
commitment, overall work satisfaction, and intent to remain in the organization
among staff nurses at a regional medical center. Nurses whose primary
job is to provide direct patient care and have clinical or non-managerial
responsibilities will be included in the study. |
| You expect between 43 and 119 nurses
to participate. |
| You plan to defend your proposal
in either December 2002, or January 2003. Data collection will begin
as soon as possible after the defense. You anticipate the data collection
will be completed by March 2003. You will be graduating in June 2003. |
You will be using four
instruments in your study, Perception of Hospital Educational Opportunity
Scale (Kirsch, 1990), Organizational Commitment Scale (Monday,
Steers, & Porter, 1979), Job Description Index (Smith,
Kendall, & Hulling, 1969), and Intent to Remain Scale (Price & Mueller,
1981).
The Perception of Hospital Educational Opportunity Scale has
16 (7 negatively worded and 9 positively worded) statements regarding
nurses' perceptions of hospital sponsored staff development activities. Respondents
rate the statements using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 = "Strongly
Disagree" to 7 = "Strongly Agree." After reverse scoring the
negatively worded statements, responses are summed and divided by 16
to provide a mean score. Higher scores indicate a more positive
perception of educational opportunity.
The Organizational Commitment Scale has 9 positively worded
statements about the feelings a nurse may have about the employing
organization. Respondents rate the statements using a 7-point
Likert scale from 1 = "Strongly Disagree" to 7 = "Strongly Agree." A
mean score is calculated as it was for the Perception of Hospital
Educational Opportunity Scale. Higher scores indicate a more
positive level of organizational commitment.
Additionally, you constructed a demographic
questionnaire to determine age, rank, gender, highest nursing degree
held, and length of time as a nurse. |
| Frequencies and frequency
percentages will be calculated on all variables in your study. Additional
descriptive statistics such as the mean, standard deviation, median, mode,
minimum, maximum, and range will be calculated for age, length of time
as a nurse, and scores for all four instruments. |
| Research Question #1: What is the perceived level of satisfaction
of staff nurses with educational opportunities at a regional medical
center? |
Descriptive statistics on the scores for the Perception of Hospital
Educational Opportunity Scale will be used to answer this
question.
| Research Question #2: What is the level of organizational
commitment of staff nurses at a regional medical center? |
Descriptive statistics on the scores for the Organizational Commitment
Scale will be used to answer this question.
| Research Question #3: What is the relationship between
the perceived satisfaction with educational opportunity and organizational
commitment, overall work satisfaction, intent to remain, and selected
demographic variables? |
Multiple regression analysis will be conducted to answer this question. Indicator
variables for gender, educational level, and rank will be entered into
the model as independent variables. (The actual number of indicators
needed for educational level and rank will be determined by how many
different levels are represented in the sample.) Additionally,
scores for organizational commitment, overall work satisfaction, and
intent to remain will be entered into the model as independent variables. Perceived
satisfaction with educational opportunity as measured by the Perception
of Hospital Educational Opportunity Scale will be entered into
the model as the dependent variable. |
| Since
educational level and rank may be correlated, the Variance Inflation Factor
(VIF) indicating multicollinearity will be checked to ensure the assumptions
necessary for using multiple regression analysis are met. If the
assumption is violated, then only one of those two factors will be included
in the model. |
| In calculating necessary sample
size, I assumed one variable would be needed for gender, one for educational
level, and three for rank, for a total of 8 independent variables in the
analysis. The power analysis calculations assume that you are going
to use all 8 variables in the regression model and that you want to know
if any one variable is significant given that all of the other 7 are already
in the model. The overall alpha level was set at 0.05. I set
different levels of overall R-squares or total amount of variance in the
data explained by the variables already in the model. Also, I assumed
that you would want to detect an increase of 5% in explained variance
for the variable to be significant. |
| To achieve 80% power with
overall R-square of 0.50, you need complete data on 80 participants. |
| Preliminary power calculations
were performed based on the formula in an article by Sande Milton (see reference
below.) Final power calculations were performed using PASS version
6.0. |
Also during our meeting, I
pointed out your options for data entry. If you would like us to
enter your data into a spreadsheet for you, our charge for this service
is $25.00 per hour. (The estimated time to enter your data is 2
1/2 minutes per questionnaire.) Your other option is to enter the
data yourself. We accept data in a variety of forms (Excel,
Qedit, Word and others.) In either case, please consult with Mary
Alspaugh in our office prior to your data entry..
The only other charge is $30.00 per hour for data management. Data
management is SAS programming to format the data to make it useful
for analysis as well as to label the data for easier reading. |
If you have any further questions
or if you feel I have not understood your goals, please let me
know. Also, I need to be kept informed of any changes that you
may make to your study. I enjoyed meeting you and look forward
to working with you on this project. Good luck with your work!
Sincerely,
Stacie E. Taylor
Statistical Consultant |
SCC #2001035
|
cc: Dr. Noit Ahl
Reference:
Milton, S., 1986. A Sample Size Formula for Multiple Regression
Studies, Public Opinion Quarterly (50), 112-118. |
|